Nearly a year after its first meeting, the state commission tasked with investigating the Parkland school shooting and making recommendations designed to prevent future massacres considered what its role should be in studying Florida’s mental health treatment system.
The members’ conclusion: It’s not our job.
“Mental health is a big topic. I think we have to be careful about transforming this into a mental health commission,” the commission’s chair, Pinellas County sheriff Bob Gualtieri, said during Wednesday’s meeting at the BB&T Center in Sunrise.
“I’m a little leery about going any further, but I need you all to tell me what you want to do,” Gualtieri said at the meeting, asking for input from the rest of the group.
Gualtieri argued the commission “spent a tremendous amount of time last year on mental health.”
That’s contrary to what the commission wrote in its initial report, which was due in January under a deadline set by the state Legislature.
“The Commission did not have time this year to do all it needed to regarding mental health,” the report states, “and the Commission will further its work in this area during 2019.”
A review of the agendas for the commission’s meetings show mental health has been a distant focus.
During its July 2018 meeting, the commission heard presentations about behavioral threat assessments — the processes by which educators, law enforcement officers and mental health providers consider whether students pose a danger to their classmates. The same month, there was an overview of Florida’s Baker Act, which governs when people can be involuntarily treated for mental health issues.
In August and November, the commission learned about confessed shooter Nikolas Cruz’s life, including the mental health services he received from Henderson Behavioral Health, an organization that is currently facing lawsuits from family members of victims.
And during this week’s meeting, there was a scheduled presentation on school-based mental health services, as well as the coordination between schools and community mental health providers — but the commission ran out of time and pushed it to a future meeting.
Now, it looks as if the commission is scaling back plans to study mental health further. Not all commission members agreed with that tack.
“What have we done to prevent this from happening again on that aspect?” said member Max Schachter, whose son Alex was killed at Stoneman Douglas last year.
“I felt very unsatisfied” with the work the commission has already done on mental health issues, Schachter said. He argued they learned about Cruz’s history, but they didn’t identify what went wrong in his mental health treatment that could be fixed to prevent troubled students from committing violent acts in the future.
“We saw that there were all the red flags, but we didn’t have the expertise. We didn’t bring in anybody to help us figure out what the problem was and how we can solve this,” Schachter said. “We know this is not the only murderer in our schools. How are we going to identify, how are we going to prevent this from happening?”
Other members suggested recommending that a different entity take up the issue.
“Every time there’s a mass shooting, the first thing that’s said publicly is, ‘That was a person with a mental health issue. There’s no gun issue; it’s a person with a mental health issue.’ So I don’t think that we can look at all the issues we looked at, and then punt down the road on the mental health issue,” said Mike Carroll, former secretary of the Florida Department of Children and Families.
“At a minimum, I would think that we make a recommendation that there be follow up by some group who’s more qualified than this group,” he said.
Gualtieri concluded that the commission should examine mental health care in schools and also how schools interact with outside providers, but not “[jump] into that whole big ocean” of examining the effectiveness of Florida’s mental health treatment system writ large.
“We’re going to leave that for somebody else,” Gualtieri said.