FL Home to Highest-Charging U.S. Hospitals
Twenty of the 50 U.S. hospitals that charge the most for their services are located in Florida — and all but one of them are for-profit, according to a study released Monday.
Most states don’t limit what hospitals charge for their services, making it easier for hospitals to set billing rates several times higher than what Medicare charges. U.S. hospitals charged on average more than three times the Medicare-allowable costs, according to the study in the June issue of the journal Health Affairs.
The study uses 2012 Medicare data to examine hospitals that charge on average more than 10 times their costs. The highest-charging Florida hospitals, according to the report are:
- North Okaloosa Medical Center, Crestview
- Bayfront Health, Brooksville
- Heart of Florida Regional Medical Center, Davenport
- Orange Park Medical Center, Lakeside
- Oak Hill Hospital, Brooksville
- Fort Walton Beach Medical Center, Fort Walton Beach
- St. Petersburg General Hospital, St. Petersburg
- Sebastian River Medical Center, Sebastian
- Osceola Regional Medical Center, Kissimmee
- Gulf Coast Medical Center, Panama City
- South Bay Hospital, Sun City Center
- Fawcett Memorial Hospital, Port Charlotte
- North Florida Regional Medical Center, Gainesville
- Lawnwood Regional Medical Center & Heart Institute, Fort Pierce
- Brandon Regional Hospital, Brandon
- Lehigh Regional Medical Center, Lehigh Acres
- Twin Cities Hospital, Niceville
- Regional Medical Center Bayonet Point, Hudson
- Bayfront Health Dade City, Dade City
- Kendall Regional Medical Center, Miami
The study comes amid a national push to increase transparency in hopes of curbing rising health costs. The Obama administration began publishing some data, including hospital spending and the costs of popular procedures, like joint replacements, three years ago in an effort to encourage consumers to compare prices.
However, the study suggests there’s a long way to go and encouraged state and federal lawmakers to require hospitals to publish cost data and for state officials to legislate a maximum amount that hospitals can charge patients. Only Maryland and West Virginia regulate hospital mark-ups, according to the study.
Without such protections, uninsured patients are often charged the full cost and may be sent to bill collectors if they don’t pay. Casualty and workers’ compensation insurers and even insured patients who go out of network may also get hit with unexpectedly high bills, according to the study.
“Hospitals’ high markups, therefore, subject many vulnerable patients to exceptionally high medical bills, which often leads to personal bankruptcy or the avoidance of needed medical services,” according to the study written by Ge Bai of Washington & Lee University in Virginia and Gerard Anderson of Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.
Community Health System, which posted revenue of $4.91 billion in its first quarter, owns 20 of the highest charging hospitals listed in the study, but a spokeswoman for the company said the data used in the study is based on a price list, which rarely reflects what consumers actually pay because it doesn’t account for discounts or charity care for low-income patients.
“Last year, our organization provided over $3.3 billion in charity care, discounts and other uncompensated care for those who can’t afford health care services,” said spokeswoman Tomi Galin.
The Federation of American Hospitals said the hospitals named in the study provided nearly $450 million in uncompensated care in 2012. The organization supports greater price transparency, but said it “will not help the average uninsured or underinsured patient. Absent coverage, the true resolution is having programs in place, like those in our hospitals, which offer discounts so that these patients do not have to prioritize concern about their ability to pay over their own health and well-being,” president Chip Kahn said in a statement.
California and New Jersey are among states mandated by state laws to provide discounts for certain uninsured patients.
The study comes amid criticism of public hospitals by Florida’s Gov. Rick Scott, a former CEO of a for-profit chain of hospitals. He recently suggested that all hospitals receiving taxpayer funds should agree to share profits as the state prepares to lose hundreds of millions of federal funds that help hospitals that treat Medicaid and uninsured patients.
Scott has been locked in a showdown — and is even suing — the Obama administration for allegedly withholding those so-called low-income pool hospital funds because Florida won’t expand its Medicaid program.
Some hospitals officials say they would be forced to shut down or cut services without those federal funds, but the governor contends the hospitals are not in as bad a financial shape as they claim; Scott has circulated hospital finance data to lawmakers to prove it.
He established a commission to examine how hospitals are spending taxpayer funds, including salaries, benefits and lobbying expenses. The Republican governor has been increasingly antagonist toward public hospitals as they have pushed for Medicaid expansion, which Scott is firmly against.
Scott’s office did not immediately comment Monday.